The controversy of the use of corporal punishment against children

Pro, thank you for your organized arguments. Counter A spanking does work. You stated that spanking children distracts them from the "real goal".

The controversy of the use of corporal punishment against children

It is one of the most common forms of violence experienced by children and is increasingly been seen as a wrong way to discipline a child. It cannot be overstated that corporal punishment is strongly rooted in society and passed on through generations.

It is widespread in homes, schools, care settings and the penal system in States and all fall under any of the following: Therefore, corporal punishment is the intentional application of physical pain as a method of behaviour change inducement.

The controversy of the use of corporal punishment against children

To distinguish corporal punishment from physical abuse can be a daunting task. There are other acts that have the same effect as corporal punishment that causes pain.

Here the difference is that in other acts, the violation is incidental, while in corporal punishment it is intentional. This shows that corporal punishment is incompatible with the CRC. However, it should be noted that these declarations still await alignment to the Constitution.

The High Court of Zimbabwe has categorically made it clear that corporal punishment no longer has any place in the human rights global order. The declarations can only enter into force once dictates of Section 1 of the Constitution are fulfilled.

Recently the State was presented with a case whereby a year-old boy was charged with rape of his minor sister. The boy was sentenced to four cane strokes in place of a custodial sentence due to his age. The law is clear that the State is required to protect children from all forms of physical and mental abuse.

Alas, here is a case involving a child committing a crime that attracts a jail term, yet among many other things, they are under-age and some form of retribution has to be done or effected. Social expectations The expectations seem to have been divided along two antagonising views, one pro the other anti- corporal punishment.

The pro-corporal punishment advocates argue that it is an appropriate tool or method for inducing behaviour change or moulding it.

The justification for this is that it is an effective way of disciplining or correcting truancy, bullying or disruptive behaviour.

Schools Still Debate Use of Paddling - ABC News

In the school setting teachers are in loco-parentis, therefore, should use corporal punishment as they also viewed and regarded as parents. The anti-corporal punishment advocates say that it is inhuman and thus deserve to be illegal. Furthermore, is it stated that children end up believing that force or violence are solutions to problems.

There is likelihood of development of resentment of the corporal punishment administer and if it is in a school setting the child may become detached and, thereby, affecting their emotional and psychological development.

The conflict One of the ways this can manifest is through effects of corporal punishment, which may include having low self-esteem, teaching children to be victims, making them to feel lonely, sad, and abandoned. It also creates barriers that impede parent child communication.

The law stresses that to educate a child of their mistake and get them to understand why they should not perform the act again should not be done through administering corporal punishment on them. Yet others who contradict this stance even go on to quote the Bible in Proverbs Way forward A delicate balance has to be struck.

Also mechanisms for the prevention of all forms of violence should be utilized. Complementing efforts of organisations such as the Zimbabwe National Council for the Welfare of Children that advocate for the protection of children as according to national, regional and international instruments can pay dividends.Nov 04,  · “Researchers, on the other hand, point out that corporal punishment typically has the opposite effect, leading to more aggressive behavior in children and less long-term obedience.

Other adverse effects, such as depression, anxiety, anti-social behavior, and increased risk of physical abuse, have also been linked to the use of corporal.

Is corporal punishment an effective means of discipline?

The use of corporal punishment to modify children’s behaviour is hotly debated in the media. Present an analysis of the psychological evidence on the effectiveness of corporal punishment. Cite This Work. Corporal punishment does not teach child to behave appropriately. Learn what the problems are with it and what you should do to discipline your children.

This article presents the case against using corporal punishment as a means for disciplining children. use physical punishment, the. While more authoritarian parents may use corporal punishment than other parents, corporal punishment is also used by parents with other parenting styles (Baumrind, ).

Thus, it is important to separate these constructs in order to understand the unique contribution of spanking. One of the negative effects brought by corporal punishment is the strong tendencies of children to develop anti-social behaviour.

The notion of corporal punishment is based on aggression and such leads to violent behaviour both exhibited by the parent and eventually the child. The corporal punishment directs focus on the major goal which is that hurting people is a bad thing; and in fact since corporal punishment is a form of hurt corporal punishment actually helps defeat the goal to make children understand that hurting people is a bad thing.

Spanking bill in Kansas sparks controversy – CNN Political Ticker - initiativeblog.com Blogs